Prevalence of uterine fibroid in a South‑Western Nigerian population: A sonographic study

Authors

  • V.O. Ukwenya Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Ekiti State University, Ado Ekiti; Sckye Hospitals Limited, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria Author
  • N. Maduemezia Nwakaego Maduemezia Memorial Medical Centre, Asaba, Nigeria Author
  • O. Afolayan Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Ekiti State University, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria Author
  • O. Alese Department of Family Medicine, Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4103/1596-2393.158926

Keywords:

Fibroid, prevalence, South-Western Nigeria, ultrasonography, uterus

Abstract

Aim: This study was carried out to evaluate the prevalence of uterine myoma, its variations, location, size and uterine anteroposterior diameter. Materials and Methods: The study utilized transabdominal ultrasound to assess myoma in 2,575 female patients. Results: Investigation showed 176 cases of myoma, representing a prevalence of 6.83%. 25% of the cases were associated with pregnancy, with solitary myoma accounting for 79.55%. Solitary myoma was noted in 59.09%. Analysis for multiple fibroid showed that 56.94% had 2 myoma; 18.06% had 3; 25% had more than 4 fibroids in-situ. Only 3.41% showed calcific degeneration. Conclusion: While higher values have been obtained in Europe, the prevalence of myoma in this study is similar to that documented for other parts of South-Western Nigeria. Results showed the preponderance of solitary myoma both in pregnant and non-pregnant subjects. Findings also showed that increased uterine anteroposterior diameter is correlated with the existence of myoma and could serve as a predictive index for the presence of fibroid.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-30

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Prevalence of uterine fibroid in a South‑Western Nigerian population: A sonographic study. (2015). Journal of Experimental and Clinical Anatomy, 14(1), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.4103/1596-2393.158926